Are conference abstracts peer reviewed

image

However, while abstracts submitted to conferences are reviewed by a scientific committee for suitability and interest to the audience prior to acceptance, it is important to note that they are not considered peer-reviewed as they are not subject to the same rigorous peer-review process as are journal articles.Jun 5, 2019

Do you use conference abstracts for publication?

Only when there are no available publications on a subject. No, the abstracts presented in conferences, in general, represent just a section of a full manuscript. Personally, I use conferences to present and discuss new ideas or concepts.

How important is abstract review in peer review?

Abstract peer review has been discussed in literature for a long time, and it is widely reconised that just the process of checking an abstract for basic structure (e.g. IMRAD) and word count is a massive undertaking for conference organisers at large events.

Can research findings change between abstract submission and conference presentation?

Therefore, by the time of the conference presentation, some details may have changed. If research findings change substantially between abstract submission and conference presentation and affect the conclusions of the research, we recommend that authors alert the conference to this discrepancy.

Are abstract publications considered as part of the scientific or academic impact?

Generally all institutes and bodies define the measures of scientific or academic impact of staff and accordingly abstract publications might be considered or not. It is better to put some more content in the conference papers and get that published if the conference organizers don’t publish those papers.

image


Are conference presentations considered peer-reviewed?

Some fields only review and publish abstracts (e.g., medicine), in some fields conferences are more important than journal publications (e.g., computer science). But as a rule of thumb: a conference is only considered to be peer-reviewed when the full paper is reviewed, and not an (extended) abstract.


Are all conference papers peer-reviewed?

Papers presented at conferences are working papers. They are not typically peer-reviewed journal articles. Some of these papers will go on to be published in peer-reviewed journals, but others will not.


Can conference abstracts be cited?

According to Scientific Style and Format [Council of Science Editors, Seventh Edition, 2006], meeting abstracts should be cited using the following format: Author(s) of abstract. Title of abstract [abstract]. In: Name of conference or title of publication.; conference dates; place of conference.


Is a conference abstract considered a publication?

However, the proceedings or the abstracts of the conferences are usually not indexed and are usually not available to others to refer to the conducted research. Abstracts of various research papers form the proceedings of various conferences, but these are not considered as publications in real sense.


Do conference presentations count as publications?

yes, it’s a publication. It is not exactly the same kind of publication as a journal publication, and depending on the field it may be viewed as less or more important than a journal publication, but it still counts as a publication.


What type of source is a conference paper?

Conference proceedings are compilations of papers, research, and information presented at conferences. Proceedings are sometimes peer-reviewed and are often the first publication of research that later appears in a scholarly publication (see above!).


How do you review a conference abstract?

Abstract Review GuidelinesIs the question or issue clearly stated?Is the significance of the work clearly stated? … If relevant, are the method, data collection, and analysis procedures well-designed and appropriate to the question addressed?Is the conceptual framework coherent? … Is the work original?More items…


Should conference abstracts have references?

Avoid citing sources in your abstract. There are two reasons for this: The abstract should focus on your original research, not on the work of others. The abstract should be self-contained and fully understandable without reference to other sources.


Should abstracts be indexed?

Abstracts are often indexed along with keywords on academic databases, so they make your work more easily findable. Since the abstract is the first thing any reader sees, it’s important that it clearly and accurately summarizes the contents of your paper.


Do journals accept abstracts?

Yes, it is possible to publish in journals. Usually the proceedings includes the abstract or report on unfinished work. So publishing the final outcome in peer reviewed journals is acceptable.


Do preprints count as publications?

No, preprints are not peer-reviewed publications.


What are conference abstracts?

Categories: Conferences. An abstract is a brief summary of the paper you want to present at an academic conference, but actually it’s much more than that. It does not only say something about the paper you are proposing, but also a lot about yourself.


Why is it important to have abstracts and conference presentations?

Therefore, it is important that abstracts and conference presentations, particularly for company-sponsored research, are developed with as rigorous a process as that of a full publication, because these may ultimately become the only source for a particular analysis.


When should abstracts be developed?

Abstracts may need to be developed soon after results are analysed and before a final clinical study report is available. In such cases, authors should always have access to the protocol, statistical tables and any other information necessary to discuss and develop the planned abstract and presentation.


What is a non author presenter?

Non-author presenter or local presenter refers to a person who presents on behalf of the author group, but who is not listed as an author.


What is a company sponsored research?

Company-sponsored refers to all types of research (preclinical and clinical, pre- and post-marketing) that is directly sponsored and/or funded by a company.


Is an abstract considered peer reviewed?

However, while abstracts submitted to conferences are reviewed by a scientific committee for suitability and interest to the audience prior to acceptance, it is important to note that they are not considered peer-reviewed as they are not subject to the same rigorous peer-review process as are journal articles.


Can you present the same research findings at more than one conference?

4.1. It is permissible to present the same research findings at more than one conference if both the first and subsequent conferences allow this. This practice may be referred to as an ‘encore’ (or more specifically an encore abstract or encore presentation). However, presentations of the same findings to the same audience should be avoided.


Can a lead author present a study?

3.3.1 While the lead author is normally expected to present study findings at conferences (and is given the first option to do so), this may not be possible due to local language requirements, availability to travel, or personal circumstances, etc. If the lead author chooses not to present study findings, another author may give the oral presentation. If none of the named authors is available or able to give the presentation, a non-author presenter may present the findings if all authors agree to this and the conference permits it (see also 1.3.1 and 1.3.2). The presenter should be agreed before the abstract is submitted (and only changed if that person becomes unavailable). The lead author should discuss the contents of the presentation and the interpretation of the findings with the presenter (and co-authors, if possible) before the conference to ensure the authors’ views are correctly represented.


Why aren’t conference abstracts published?

The most common reason provided by authors of abstracts for not publishing their study results in full has been reported to simply be “lack of time,” and not because the results were considered unreliable or negative [ 34 ].


Why are systematic reviews biased?

In the context of publication bias arising during stage II (i.e., if abstracts with positive or significant results are selectively published in full), systematic reviews relying solely on fully published studies can be biased because positive results would be overrepresented.


What is systematic review?

Systematic reviewers aim to be comprehensive in summarizing the existing literature addressing specific research questions. This generally involves a thorough search for published studies as well as for ongoing or recently completed studies that are not yet published. Ongoing and recently completed studies are often identified through searches of registries, such as ClinicalTrials.gov, and of conference proceedings. While identifying and cataloging unpublished studies from conference proceedings is generally recognized as a good practice during systematic reviews, controversy remains whether to include study results that are reported in conference abstracts. Current guidelines are conflicting. The United States Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ), through its Effective Healthcare Program, recommends that searches for conference abstracts be considered, but Cochrane and the United States National Academy of Sciences (NAS) both recommend always searching for and including conference abstracts in systematic reviews [ 1, 2, 3 ]. Our objectives in this commentary are to summarize the existing evidence both for and against the inclusion of conference abstracts in systematic reviews and provide suggestions for systematic reviewers when deciding whether and how to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews.


What is the most common scenario for publication bias?

The most frequent scenario for publication bias is when studies with “positive” (or “significant”) results are selectively published, or are published sooner, than studies with either null or negative results. Publication bias can be conceptualized as occurring in two stages: (I) from a study’s end to presentation of its results at a conference …


Is it a good practice to catalog unpublished studies?

While identifying and cataloging unpublished studies from conference proceedings is generally recognized as a good practice during systematic reviews, controversy remains whether to include study results that are reported in conference abstracts. Existing guidelines provide conflicting recommendations.


Should conference abstracts be included in a systematic review?

Based on the available evidence and on our experience, we suggest that instead of arbitrarily deciding to include conference abstracts or not in a systematic review, systematic reviewers should consider the availability of evidence. If available evidence is sparse or conflicting, it may be worthwhile to include conference abstracts. If results from conference abstracts are included, then it is necessary to make diligent attempts to contact the authors of the abstract and examine study registers and published protocols to obtain further and confirmatory information on methods and results.


Why are abstracts not considered a publication?

You also do not have journals solely publishing abstracts (apart from conference listings), so this says that abstracts are not to be considered a publication, due to their limited ability to transfer reliable knowledge.


What is an extended abstract?

The terms, ‘abstracts’ or ‘extended abstracts’, indicates that these are not validly published, and therefore, once the conference is over, the authors must publish the full paper immediately in a regular primary journal. In fact, both oral and poster presentations in conferences are meant to report ongoing works.


Is a short abstract a full paper?

Admittedly, a published short abstract (even in an index journal) is not equivalent to a full paper, but as it is published in journal with DOI, it could be considered as a journal publication. However, it could be specified in CV with separate titles under journal publications (e.g., conference abstract publication).


Is anything published anywhere a publication?

Anything published anywhere is a publication, what matters is peer-reviewed publications that is considered by peers as an important source of information. Generally all institutes and bodies define the measures of scientific or academic impact of staff and accordingly abstract publications might be considered or not.


Is it better to put more content in a conference paper?

It is better to put some more content in the conference papers and get that published if the conference organizers don’t publish those papers. Many conference presentations. The paper is written short which might be suitable for the conference but for the research paper need more thoughtful writing. …


Is an extended abstract a conference abstract?

Some extended abstracts published in conference proceedings come close or are even equivalent to articles in a conventional journal, and it should be the author’s call to label it a conference abstract, or article .


lostintime

I know publications are peer-reviewed, but are posters/orals considered peer-reviewed? Thanks.


bored

I don’t think so. Try to find the title of the poster on the internet,


osteon

I know publications are peer-reviewed, but are posters/orals considered peer-reviewed? Thanks.


lostintime

So for stuff like CaRMS, if your abstract gets accepted, then you will definitely have a poster/oral. So do you list it as twice? I mean it seems to kinda dilute it since everyone knows that you can’t JUST have an abstract for a conference, you usually have a poster/oral right? So is it ok to just list the poster/oral?


osteon

No you can be an author on an abstract but not actually be the one who presented. Listing things twice will look redundant and like resume padding. Therefore, do as I said above, I.e. Write out the abstracts you have authored/co-authored and specify which ones you presented and what form of presentation they were.

image


Recommendations For Conference Organizers


Authorship

  • 1.1 Authors
    1.1.1 The author listing on conference abstracts and presentations should reflect the people who did the research or contributed substantially to the design of the study or to the interpretation of the results, and who were involved in the development of the presentation and who are willing t…
  • 1.2 Contributors/study groups
    1.2.1 We encourage conferences (and company sponsors) not to limit the number of authors (or contributors) who may be listed on an abstract or presentation, because this practice may prevent the author list from accurately reflecting who did the work. However, named authors should be li…

See more on researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com


Conference Abstracts

  • 2.1 To facilitate linkage between conference abstracts and presentations, and subsequent publications, abstracts should include a study identifier such as a registration number (for clinical trials), study name, protocol number or grant number. To encourage this, conference organizers should require this information in a specific field on the submission form and publish it with the …

See more on researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com


Conference Presentations

  • 3.1 General considerations
    3.1.1 Study identifiers (e.g., trial registration numbers) should be included on presentations to improve linkage between conference presentations and subsequent publications (see also Section 4). 3.1.2 All funding sources for the research, any assistance with the presentation (e.g. …
  • 3.2 Posters
    3.2.1 While there are platforms where posters can be made permanently available (e.g. on conference websites or platforms such as F1000 Research), some journals regard this as prior publication which may jeopardize full publication. Authors should therefore check the policies o…

See more on researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com


Encore Abstracts and Presentations

  • 4.1. It is permissible to present the same research findings at more than one conference if both the first and subsequent conferences allow this. This practice may be referred to as an ‘encore’ (or more specifically an encore abstract or encore presentation). However, presentations of the same findings to the same audience should be avoided. 4.2 Although encore abstracts are not consid…

See more on researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com


Copyright Considerations

  • 5.1 Copyright transfer or publishing licence agreements that are executed during the abstract submission process are common when abstracts are to be formally published (e.g. in a conference-specific journal issue). These agreements relate only to the abstract, not to any subsequent presentation, unless explicitly agreed otherwise. 5.2 Copyright in a presentation is n…

See more on researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com


Citing Conference Material

  • 6.1 References (or citations) in scientific texts provide readers with source or background material and are used to justify or support statements. To be useable, the referenced material must be both permanently accessible and reliable; therefore, citations to full publications in journals that apply rigorous peer review are the ideal. However, if citations are needed for resear…

See more on researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com

Leave a Comment