Can conference organizers reject a paper even after reviewers accept


Thus, the answer ought to be no, it cannot be accepted (except in certain unusual cases, such as the organizers deciding there is a hidden nugget with value enough for shepherding to improve the paper). A struggling, eccentric, or fraudulent organization, however might just not care, and accept it anyway.


How does the reviewer decide to reject or accept a paper?

Abdalla, although the reviewer can make an initial assessment of a paper to determine the extent to which it fits within the target journal’s publication requirements, the ultimate decision to reject or to accept, subject to major or minor amendments rests with the guest editor of a special issue or the editor of the journal.

Why do some journals get rejected by referees?

Sometimes a journal is not so well known and the referees simply don’t understand what it’s looking for. Sometimes a journal is famous enough to have mythical standards attributed to it that would be completely unworkable in practice.

What happens if two reviewers give different recommendations to the editor?

If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. If there is a mix of opinions the editor has to make a judgment, subject to whatever internal procedures the journal has in place.

Can a paper be rejected by an editor for no reason?

Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper.


Can research paper be rejected after acceptance?

In other words, the acceptance decision should be made with pages in mind. While it is reasonable to reject a paper up front due to lack of space, backlog of similar papers, etc, it is not reasonable to do this once the paper has been accepted for publication.

Can paper be rejected after conference?

Actually it is better to go for a high quality journal for your valuable work, because in conferences they will reject the paper on many reasons irrespective of author perspections and also may be of more no. of papers or conference suitability etc…. No need to worry and wishing you a good success in projects.

What happens if your paper is accepted in a conference?

With any conference, if you submit a paper which is subsequently accepted, you are expected to attend the conference and present the paper.

What happens if my paper gets rejected?

Appeal the rejection If a legitimate misunderstanding or error led the reviewers to recommend rejection, outline your points to the editor without belittling the reviewers or being argumentative. Appeals based on the scope of the journal or the perceived impact of your work are unlikely to succeed.

How many times does a paper get rejected?

Several studies suggest that at least 20 percent of published articles were first rejected by another journal. An older study found that about 1 percent of published articles were rejected by four or more journals before being accepted.

What to do after rejecting a paper?

Resubmitting to the Same Journal If the problems cited in the rejection letter refer to steps or results that you have done but, for some reason, were omitted from your paper, you may be able to resubmit your manuscript with the missing methods or data. It is best to check with the journal office first.

What does it mean to be accepted for conference?

Yes, “accepted” means that your talk is going to be included in the program (when it’s published) and you are expected to present it at the conference.

Can I present my paper that has been accepted by a journal at a conference?

Since your paper has already been accepted by the journal, you should first write to the journal editor and ask if it’s acceptable to submit the findings at the conference. A lot will also depend on whether copyright has been transferred to the journal at the time of acceptance.

Do conference proceedings count as publications?

yes, it’s a publication. It is not exactly the same kind of publication as a journal publication, and depending on the field it may be viewed as less or more important than a journal publication, but it still counts as a publication.

What are the reasons editors reject papers?

Reasons why a paper can get rejected:Out of scope. … Lacking state-of-the-art overview. … Lack of originality. … Lack of conclusion. … Flaws in research design or methods. … Unclear research question. … Redundant publication. … Lack of relevance.More items…•

What are the most common reasons for the rejection of a manuscript?

There can be a number of reasons; the most prominent ones (non-limiting) are discussed:Lack of Novelty, originality, and presentation of obsolete study. … Improper rationale. … Unimportant and irrelevant subject matter. … Flaws in methodology. … Lack of interpretations. … Inappropriate or incomplete statistics.More items…

Why do papers get rejected?

The reasons for a paper being rejected once it has been reviewed fall mainly into two categories: (1) problems with the research; and (2) problems with the writing/presentation of the paper. A paper may be rejected because of problems with the research on which it is based.

What is the importance of rejection in writing?

Although nothing but time and perspective can really take away the sting of it, understanding how conference and journal article rejection works can often help with the process. It also helps you give your next article or conference proposal the best chance possible.

Is it bad to reject a project?

Even work that is ultimately rejected is not inherently “bad.” That said, as a journal editor, conference programmer, and journal reviewer I can assure you: there is work out there that is not good enough yet. Certainly, if the underlying concept of a project is inherently flawed or even unethical, the peer review process should catch that and the author may not be able to salvage that work.

Why are papers rejected?

Papers are typically rejected because they lack any novelty, there are some major errors, the theory has no clear motivation, the results are too trivial, the paper is very hard to comprehend and if they are written in too bad English. other reasons may appear also depending on the scientific field. Cite.

When is an article accepted with minor revisions?

An article is accepted with minor revisions usually when there is a missing citation, or if there are language problems, or if the communicative way of transferring ideas is not clear. Major revisions are required if the general idea of the paper is novel, but the presentation needs a lot of revisions.

Is Nature accepted in good journals?

Sergyeyev, this decision also depends on the journal. A well established and major journal, take Nature or one of the top 5 journals in your field as examples, may reject very good papers, which may be perfectly acceptable in good journals.


Leave a Comment