Can conference program committee change decisions after review

Will healthcare reform legislation have to pass through a conference committee?

And before you nod off from boredom, let Decoder make this point: Healthcare reform legislation will have to pass through a conference committee if it is to become law. And that is when some of the most important decisions about the bill’s structure might be made.

How can I make sure my program committee makes the right decisions?

Make sure that each program committee member has read each paper that will come up for discussion. Even if reviews have been farmed out, the PC members are responsible for making the decision, and if they must depend only on reading reviews, the right result may not occur.

What is the difference between programme committee member and reviewer?

The responsibilities of a programme committee member and a mere reviewer could easily be the same, or differ. All depends on the particular conference/workshop setup. E.g., in computer science/AI there the difference is mainly a result of the venue size.

How do I identify the chair of the program review committee?

The review committee chair should be identified in the memo that charges the review committee. The advice in this KB document is provided to supplement instructions provided in the charge memo. As the chair of the program review committee, you decide on a general plan for the review.

Are conference proceedings reviewed?

Generally speaking, papers presented at conferences are working papers; they are not peer-reviewed journal articles. Some conference papers may evolve into peer-reviewed publications in the future, while others will not.

What is review process in conference publication?

Peer review is a process in which a scientific paper is evaluated by a group of experts in the same field to make sure it meets the necessary standards for acceptance and publication.

Are conference proceedings considered peer-reviewed?

The papers presented at a conference have typically been accepted following a review process, however, not all published proceedings are peer reviewed so it is important to assess the quality of the conference. Criteria to consider: Impact of previous papers (through citation counts)

Do conferences reject papers?

When submitting papers to a conference there are generally many papers that are submitted and get rejected. This is especially true for competitive conferences, where less than 1/4 of the papers get accepted, or sometimes even less than 1/10.

Are conference proceedings considered publications?

yes, it’s a publication. It is not exactly the same kind of publication as a journal publication, and depending on the field it may be viewed as less or more important than a journal publication, but it still counts as a publication.

Are conference papers reliable?

A conference is somewhat like an open market or bazaar – don’t believe everything the “seller” tells you! However, in some fields (e.g., computer and information science, public administration) major conferences are highly-regarded, the papers are strictly peer-reviewed, and the published proceedings are good sources.

Do conference proceedings have impact factor?

Conference proceedings that have been published as part of an indexed journal are citable items – they appear in the denominator. However, conference proceedings that have been published as a stand-alone item do not receive an Impact Factor.

Do conference papers matter?

A conference paper presentation gives you a platform to interact with people of the same field but journal publication is generally considered superior especially with a good impact factor.

What is the difference between conference paper and conference proceedings?

Proceedings are the papers themselves, or increasingly these days abstracts. Conference journal papers are usually a selection of papers, sometimes by track or that particularly focus on the conference theme published in the journal associated with the conference. Sometimes these are developed versions of the papers.

Do conferences reject posters?

It depends on the conference and the field. Some conferences have limited space for posters and there is plenty of submissions for those slots, so some percentage are rejected. Other conference have space for all submitted posters.

How many reviewers are in a conference?

The number of reviewers for any single given paper is usually 3 or 4, and each PC member may be assigned to review a larger number of papers, often between 10 to 25.

How do you handle paper rejection?

Here are the most common options for next steps after rejection:Appeal the rejection. … Resubmit to the same journal. … Make changes and submit to a different journal. … Make no changes and submit to another journal. … File the manuscript away and never resubmit it.

What is the basis for a law firm to nominate a management committee?

In law firms, however, nominations to a management committee are often made on the basis of seniority, revenue-generation or availability of time, none of which takes into account any of these desirable traits.

What is the tendency of small committees to make extreme decisions?

In behavioral science, there is a well-documented propensity for small committees to drift toward “extreme” decisions, that is, a group of individuals acting as a committee often makes a decision that none of the individuals acting alone would make, given the same information. There seems to be a number of reasons for this tendency.

What is the social pressure of a committee?

Another theory is that the social setting of the committee tends to propel the committee towards a decision, and the more bonded the group, the more committed they are to reaching one.

How do organizations manage themselves?

Today, organizations usually manage themselves by some form of committee. Corporations manage through a board of directors and usually also an operational management team; large legal departments may have a senior legal management team. Many law firms have a management committee, executive committee or board of directors.

Why does diffusion of responsibility weigh less heavily on an individual?

An individual’s part in a group’s decision weighs less heavily on him/her than an individual decision would because of the clear diffusion of responsibility, and the implication is that not as thorough an evaluation of the issues is made when the decision is attributed to the group.

How to be a good committee member?

Therefore, it appears that the optimal committee members are those who: 1 exhibit the character strengths of honesty and bravery, are high in emotional intelligence, 2 are aware of their unique expertise and perspectives, 3 are willing to speak out and promote their viewpoints, 4 are committed to applying the same rigor to making good group decisions as they would apply to making individual ones, and 5 possess the collaborative conflict skills to wrangle over a highly charged issue without seriously undermining his/her relationship with other committee members.

Is it better to be allied or collegial?

While it is pleasant and in many ways beneficial to maintain a collegial atmosphere among the management group, it is not necessarily better for the group to be highly allied. Both a healthy dose of confidence in one’s own contribution and a respectful “show me” skepticism towards others’ viewpoints can be useful.

On the selection process

The selection is a compromise among different evaluations of individual PC members. As any compromise, such a selection does not have a rationale (although individual evaluations may have one) other than the rationale of social compromise.

On by-products of the selection process

Typical by-product of the selection process are “reports” or “reviews” written by the PC members and/or their sub-referees. It is indeed a question what to do with such by-product. My own suggestion to a PC would be:

How to try to do the best selection

It all starts with selecting the PC itself. It is common wisdom that the PC common expertise should cover the various sub-areas that are part of the conference scope. More importantly, the PC should consist of people who are qualified to do the job (i.e., evaluate scientific work, exercise scientific judgement, be honest and open to discussion).

Baruch Awerbuch ‘s Maxim

The decision of a PC is a random variable with an expectation determined by the submission’s quality and a variance determined by the PC’s quality.

Choosing committee members

You may need to invite to the PC someone you don’t know (someone you have not seen in action at a PC). Get others’ opinions of such people before issuing an invitation. It’s best to do this by phone, not by email: many people prefer not to communicate negative opinions in writing, and you can learn a lot from tone of voice.

Meeting: physical, phone, or electronic

A face-to-face meeting is the most effective way for the program committee to make decisions. It is also a good way for top researchers to meet one another (and to socialize). However, travel to a common location is costly in time, money, and environmental impact. It can be hard to schedule a time and place that everyone can attend.

Reviews

Identify papers that are too long, and possibly pre-reject them. This is not just those with too many pages, but also those who played too many games with margins and formatting. It’s not fair to let some people effectively have more space than others.

Pre-meeting decisions

Discussions during the review period (or after the review period but before the meeting proper) should resolve many difficult cases ahead of time, reducing the amount of discussion that is necessary at the meeting itself.

Discussion ordering

I think it’s a bad idea to review all the papers in order of their rankings. It tends to bias people regarding their decision, and it gives a very misleading indication of how far along the process is. I think it is better to thematically group them, permitting better comparisons (and possibly better conflicts-of-interest grouping).

Physical logistics

Have a name placard for each person; this is really nice to have, even if everyone “ought” to know everyone else’s name.

Discussion

Be unremittingly positive. It’s easy for the whole PC to go negative. But don’t annoy the PC by pushing through papers for which there is no buy-in.

How to make a committee meeting more effective?

1. Make sure an evaluation process of the committee meetings is in place. Immediate feedback is a huge factor in gauging the success of the meeting, and making changes so meetings are efficient and effective. 2. Post an annual calendar at the beginning of the year.

Why are committees important?

Committees are also indispensable to the work of an association, enabling work to get done in the most efficient manner. But committees can also be incredible time sucks, eating up countless hours while not accomplishing much .

What is a written committee description?

1. Written Committee Description. There should be a written description of what is expected of each committee to guide the chair and members. The description should summarize the purpose of the committee, its composition and selection procedure, and the specific duties of the committee.***. 2.

What happens after a change is approved?

After a change is approved, the project manager should reflect the change in the project documents, project management plans and project baselines.

Why do projects have a change control board?

Many projects have a Change Control Board. Because as the project will receive change requests and these must be evaluated by the change control board. The board is responsible for reviewing and analyzing change requests. Once a change request is submitted, this is analyzed by the CCB.

Choosing Committee Members

Meeting: Physical, Phone, Or Electronic

Reviews

Pre-Meeting Decisions

• Discussions during the review period (or after the review period but beforethe meeting proper) should resolve many difficult cases ahead of time,reducing the amount of discussion that is necessary at the meeting itself.For any papers that have both positive and negative reviews, you shouldsend mail to each reviewer, asking them to read the other re…

See more on homes.cs.washington.edu

Discussion Ordering

Physical Logistics

Discussion

After The Meeting