Short answer: Hell no! Depending on the editorial policies of the venue you submit, they may or may not allow to add co-authors during the review process. Some may even accept you to add co-authors after acceptance of the paper.
Should conference organizers consider authorship criteria when designing submission sites?
While the authors of this document recognize that individual conference guidelines should be respected, they urge organizers to consider authorship criteria and data transparency when designing submission sites and setting parameters around word/character count and content for abstracts.
Can I add a new co-author to my research paper?
To answer your question, it is not clear why you want to add a new co-author at this stage. It is unethical to add someone as a co-author if they have not contributed significantly to the work. As per the ICMJE guidelines on authorship, a person can qualify to be an author only if he/she meets all of the following criteria:
How do you list authors on conference abstracts and presentations?
1.1.1 The author listing on conference abstracts and presentations should reflect the people who did the research or contributed substantially to the design of the study or to the interpretation of the results, and who were involved in the development of the presentation and who are willing to take responsibility for the findings.
What to do with your publication after acceptance?
If you really want to reap the benefits from your publication, there are still things that require your attention. When it comes to life after acceptance, you can approach the various aspects of what you need to do by means of the following moniker: own it; share it; track it! Own it!
Can I add co-authors after acceptance?
It’s possible to change the author list after acceptance, but the editors will be suspicious and will ask for an explanation of why nothing unethical is going on. I assume you discussed authorship with your advisor when you submitted the paper, and both of you approved of the author list at the time of submission.
Can I change author order after acceptance?
Typically, journal editors do not encourage changes to authorship, particulary after a manuscript has been processed. When an authorship dispute arises after a paper has been submitted/accepted for publication, journals require all the authors involved to give consent for this change.
Can I Adding an author after submission?
Yes it is acceptable, according to the guides for authors. Yes, it’s possible during the pre-acceptance stage but you need to submit a declaration (Change of authorship request form) signed by all authors. However, the decision to accept the change or not is depends upon the editor-in-chief.
Is it possible to add new author during the revision process of manuscript?
Usually journals do not have any restriction on adding new authors in the authorship list during the revision process. The cover letter submitted with the revised manuscript should clearly mention why the new author was added and what was the exact contribution of the new author in the revised manuscript.
Can I remove a co author?
It is unethical to add or remove an author once you have submitted your manuscript. Any changes to authorship should be made only with the approval of all the co-authors. If your co-authors are aware of this, you can tell the editor the reason why you removed the fifth co-author.
Can I change corresponding author after acceptance Elsevier?
The person designated as Corresponding Author may be changed, but a Corresponding Author must be a registered Editorial Manager user.
Can a paper be rejected after acceptance?
In other words, the acceptance decision should be made with pages in mind. While it is reasonable to reject a paper up front due to lack of space, backlog of similar papers, etc, it is not reasonable to do this once the paper has been accepted for publication.
How do you ask someone to be a co author?
How I can politely ask him for his contribution? Just sent him/her an email with a brief summary of the ideas you are interested in and ask him/her if he/she is interested on the project, it has worked for me. Otherwise, try to attend one of his/her talks and approach him/her and the end of the talk, if possible.
Do second author papers count?
Second author is the second main person who contributes mainly to experiments and manuscript writing. … Authorship consideration is usually all of your contribution to that project. Even Second place as an authorship displays significant weightage in your research career. So do count on every contribution.
Who is more important first author or corresponding author?
However, the author who guides all authors in planning a research work and who may provide his/ her lab, lab facilities and other requirements is the Corresponding author. Corresponding author is the most important author in a research article.
What is the difference between co author and corresponding author?
A co-author is any person who has made a significant contribution to a journal article. They also share responsibility and accountability for the results. If more than one author writes an article, you’ll choose one person to be the corresponding author.
How many first authors can a paper have?
Shared co-first authorship is defined as two or more authors who have worked together on a publication and contributed equally . This equal contribution is often indicated in the fine print of a published paper or in an investigator’s curriculum vitae .
Why should you add a co-author’s name?
From your question, it seems that you wish to add the co-author’s name because he/she has helped you with some aspects of your study. However, if the nature of the help you have received does not fulfill all of the above criteria, it is best to mention this person in the acknowledgements section rather than add him/her as a co-author.
How to be an author of a book?
As per the ICMJE guidelines on authorship, a person can qualify to be an author only if he/she meets all of the following criteria: 1 Made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND 2 Drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; AND 3 Approved of the final version to be published; AND 4 Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
What are the criteria for being an author?
As per the ICMJE guidelines on authorship, a person can qualify to be an author only if he/she meets all of the following criteria: Made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND.
What is the first step in a researcher’s journey?
Conducting research is the first and most exciting step in a researcher’s journey. If you are currently in this stage of your publishing journey, subscribe & learn about best practices to sail through this stage and set yourself up for successful publication.
When should I contact CMT Support?
In general, authors should contact their Conference Chairs for all conference related questions. Users can contact CMT Support if they are locked out of their account.
Why can’t I find my conferences after I log in?
This is more than likely because you are logging in with an incorrect email. Please note that all conferences from 2018 and prior have been removed from CMT. The data is irretrievable.
Why can’t I find the “Create New Submission” button?
“Paper Submission” and “Edit Submission” activities need to be enabled by the Chair (with appropriate deadlines) for authors to submit from their consoles. In a multi-track conference, this needs to be done for each track separately. Please contact the Chairs directly.
How do I know if my paper was submitted properly?
It was submitted properly by the very nature of the paper being visible in the Author Console. CMT will now send confirmation emails to all authors (whether they have a valid CMT account or not) upon creation of a submission.
What does it mean that a co-author needs to be a registered user?
Adding an unregistered email (an email that is not a valid account in CMT) as a co-author will not add the user to the conference; it only acts as a placeholder in the submission for the co-author. The co-auther is required to register their email in CMT.
Why does my paper status show “not available?”
It means the paper is still under review and no decision has been made yet. Please contact Chairs directly in this regard. When logged into your conference, go to your name dropdown in the upper right corner, then select ‘Contact Chairs.’
How can I view the status of my submission?
If the status is not visible, it means the paper is still under review and no decision has been made yet. Please contact Chairs directly in this regard. When logged into your conference, go to your name dropdown in the upper right corner, then select ‘Contact Chairs.’
Why is it important to have abstracts and conference presentations?
Therefore, it is important that abstracts and conference presentations, particularly for company-sponsored research, are developed with as rigorous a process as that of a full publication, because these may ultimately become the only source for a particular analysis.
What is a non author presenter?
Non-author presenter or local presenter refers to a person who presents on behalf of the author group, but who is not listed as an author.
What is copyright transfer agreement?
5.1 Copyright transfer or publishing licence agreements that are executed during the abstract submission process are common when abstracts are to be formally published ( e.g. in a conference-specific journal issue). These agreements relate only to the abstract, not to any subsequent presentation, unless explicitly agreed otherwise.
What is a company sponsored research?
Company-sponsored refers to all types of research (preclinical and clinical, pre- and post-marketing) that is directly sponsored and/or funded by a company.
When should abstracts be developed?
Abstracts may need to be developed soon after results are analysed and before a final clinical study report is available. In such cases, authors should always have access to the protocol, statistical tables and any other information necessary to discuss and develop the planned abstract and presentation.
Is an abstract considered peer reviewed?
However, while abstracts submitted to conferences are reviewed by a scientific committee for suitability and interest to the audience prior to acceptance, it is important to note that they are not considered peer-reviewed as they are not subject to the same rigorous peer-review process as are journal articles.
Can you present the same research findings at more than one conference?
4.1. It is permissible to present the same research findings at more than one conference if both the first and subsequent conferences allow this. This practice may be referred to as an ‘encore’ (or more specifically an encore abstract or encore presentation). However, presentations of the same findings to the same audience should be avoided.
When it comes to the area you’ve been researching, you want your name to be synonymous with that topic. You also want there to be no ambiguity about who you are (which is especially important if you happen to share a common name with several other researchers).
There is no better way of making sure your research gets the impact it deserves than by sharing broadly and widely. Different publishers and journals vary in their approach to the topic of sharing, but luckily there is a fantastic tool for those of you who are struggling to work out what’s possible: www.howcanishareit.com.
After you’ve spent all this time and effort in publishing and promoting your paper, it only makes sense to keep a good eye on it and analyze the reactions to it. With article-level metrics, you can, for example, see who is talking about your paper online and what they’re saying about it.
There are many options here (and more besides – see our resources on getting noticed and ensuring visibility to read more) for ensuring that your article doesn’t simply fade into the vast backdrop of all those millions of other articles. It may be that not all are appropriate for your own particular context.
Christopher Tancock is Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier’s Editors ‘, Authors ‘ and Reviewers ‘ Updates and works on related communications projects. Based in Oxford, Chris has degrees in European studies and linguistics and is founder of Pint of Life, an initiative which delivers free life-saving skills into the local community.