How to review a paper for a conference


  • Don’t start your review when you are not in a good mood.
  • Be responsible and do it in time. …
  • Try to write in a simple and clear English. …
  • Be open to new ideas and don’t try to take the author to what you want. …
  • Complicated papers are not necessarily of good quality. …
  • Remember, your style of writing is not standard. …
  • Do not be so harsh. …

More items…


What is a conference paper and what is it for?

A conference paper is a written document that outlines your oral presentation at a conference. These papers cover the details of the presentations for attendees to review in situations when the attendee was not able to hear the oral presentation.

Can I send an abstract of a review paper to a conference?

Bookmark this question. Show activity on this post. I sent an abstract of a review paper for oral presentation to a conference, and it was accepted. The presentation will be about the most important developments and contributions made in the last decade on my specific area of research.

Can I be reviewer of the conference papers that I attend?

Some of journal editors, book editors and many conference editors organize mutual review process between paper contributors. The idea of this advice is that you can be reviewer of the conference papers that you attend.

How do you review a paper during the paper review process?

During the paper review process, review the paper using the following guidelines: The primary aspect for accepting/rejecting a paper is its contribution: We consider a paper of sufficient conference quality if it presents a strong, tangible contribution to a specific aspect of the authors’ research.


How do you write a review for a conference paper?

“Reviewing the paper” means reading to a level that you understand what the authors did, why it’s interesting, and why it’s important. As part of your review, you should note these things. And you should accept or reject the paper based on whether you think the *contribution* is significant enough.

What is review process in conference publication?

Peer review is a process in which a scientific paper is evaluated by a group of experts in the same field to make sure it meets the necessary standards for acceptance and publication.

What is a conference review?

The reviews help the Executive Committee select which papers to accept and reject. Additionally, your reviews help the authors of papers make their papers and presentations stronger. Finally, your suggestions help the Program Chairs select the outstanding papers.

Can you present a paper under review at a conference?

In social sciences, it is a popular practice to present a paper that is under review in a conference. Nothing is wrong with it.

Do conferences reject papers?

because in conferences they will reject the paper on many reasons irrespective of author perspections and also may be of more no. of papers or conference suitability etc….

Is a conference paper peer-reviewed?

The papers presented at a conference have typically been accepted following a review process, however, not all published proceedings are peer reviewed so it is important to assess the quality of the conference. Criteria to consider: Impact of previous papers (through citation counts)

How long does it take to review a conference paper?

Doing reviews takes time. On average, an experienced reviewer spends about 2 hours reviewing a 12-page conference paper, and 4-8 hours reviewing a 15-page journal paper. If you are inexperienced, you need to schedule more time. Before accepting to do reviews, be prepared to dedicate enough time to them.

How do you review an abstract for a conference?

Abstract Review GuidelinesIs the question or issue clearly stated?Is the significance of the work clearly stated? … If relevant, are the method, data collection, and analysis procedures well-designed and appropriate to the question addressed?Is the conceptual framework coherent? … Is the work original?More items…

How do I write a review for IEEE conference?

Q: How should I write my paper according to the IEEE conference proceedings format?Abstract.Title and affiliations.Introduction.Proposed method.Experimental data and results.Conclusions.Acknowledgments.References.

Can you present an already published paper at a conference?

It is also acceptable to present your published work at a conference. However, in this case, it is generally considered good practice to cite your published article and provide a link at the end of the presentation if it is avilable online.

Can I publish an article that I presented in a conference?

Most recent answer You can publish an article previously presented in a conference . It should not be proceeding of the conference.

Can I present my paper that has been accepted by a journal at a conference?

Since your paper has already been accepted by the journal, you should first write to the journal editor and ask if it’s acceptable to submit the findings at the conference. A lot will also depend on whether copyright has been transferred to the journal at the time of acceptance.

How do you present a literature review in a conference?

Presenting Literature Review in the Introduction and Discussion SectionsIntroduce the topic.Establish the significance of the study.Provide an overview of the relevant literature.Establish a context for the study using the literature.Identify knowledge gaps.Illustrate how the study will advance knowledge on the topic.

How do I write a review for IEEE conference?

Q: How should I write my paper according to the IEEE conference proceedings format?Abstract.Title and affiliations.Introduction.Proposed method.Experimental data and results.Conclusions.Acknowledgments.References.

Are all conferences peer-reviewed?

Some fields only review and publish abstracts (e.g., medicine), in some fields conferences are more important than journal publications (e.g., computer science). But as a rule of thumb: a conference is only considered to be peer-reviewed when the full paper is reviewed, and not an (extended) abstract.

What is peer-reviewed presentation?

Description. Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.

Most recent answer

To review a paper, it is advisable to read some available reviews in open public domain. Even comments on published and unpublished papers can help to understand the review mechanism.

Popular Answers (1)

Nowadays you have number of new and not yet established publishers that invite reviewers and editors for their international peer-reviewed open access journals. I received plenty of such invitations. Honestly, I ignore them because I have a more or less fixed lists of journals that I regularly receive invitations from for paper review.

All Answers (10)

If you mean reviewing academic papers, perhaps you should start with student journals. Some directories to consider – check journal announcements if they are looking for reviewers:

Similar questions and discussions

If research is published in conference proceedings, can it still be published in journals?

How to write a conference paper?

There is no specific Introduction or Literature Review. The conference paper starts directly with the Purpose of the Paper, where you need to state the aims and objectives of the research. Then in a very short paragraph, state the research approach. The core concern of a conferment paper is the results that you attained. Present your results in coherence with the innovative conclusive proceeding. Offer recommendations and scopes for developing your thought in future.

How to make a conference paper successful?

Open debates for discussions and remain ready for feedbacks and rejections from your peers. If you are getting a notable amount of critical points of view, then consider your conference paper as a success. Gaining the attention of your peers adds relevance and significance to your conference paper. Always welcome and appreciate their ideologies and school of thinking.

How to write a presentation for a research paper?

In the first paragraph of your paper, express the purpose of your presentation. Support it with relevant information and statistics. Explain the aim and objectives with great precision. Make sure that you give correct, valid and details about the database. Explain the results that you have attained while resolving the research issue. Express the relevance of your paper and determine its importance for future attention. In every step acknowledge the former researcher who guided you through the research process. In every step add your extended thought.

What is the purpose of offering a unique and effective solution to your conference paper?

By means of offering a unique and effective solution to your conference paper, you can add great relevance to the subject and this is something that gets highly acknowledged by scholars.

How to introduce a research paper?

Your Introduction should be constructed as per the interest of the audience. There is no need for any reference to former research work. You are not supposed to elaborate on the ways you have attained the results. Just stay focused in explaining the Results that you have attained from your experiment. Conclude the conference paper with affirmations and possibilities for future research.

Why do we need a conference paper?

Conference papers can be an effective way to try out new ideas, introduce your work to colleagues, and hone your research questions. Presenting at a conference is a great opportunity for gaining valuable feedback from a community of scholars and for increasing your professional stature in your field. A conference paper is often both …

Why are conference papers special?

Knowing your audience is critical for any writing assignment, but conference papers are special because you will be physically interacting with them. Take a look at our handout on audience.

How to structure a presentation?

How will you structure your presentation? This is an important question, because your presentation format will shape your written document. Some possibilities for your session include: 1 A visual presentation, including software such as PowerPoint or Prezi 2 A paper that you read aloud 3 A roundtable discussion

What is roundtable discussion?

A roundtable discussion. Presentations can be a combination of these styles. For example, you might read a paper aloud while displaying images. Following your paper, you might participate in an informal conversation with your fellow presenters. You will also need to know how long your paper should be.

How to make a paper easier to read?

If you are using a slideshow, you can indicate when to change slides. Increasing the font size to 14-16 pt. can make your paper easier to read.

How to anticipate how your ideas will sound?

One way to anticipate how your ideas will sound is to read your paper out loud. Reading out loud is an excellent proofreading technique and is a great way to check the clarity of your ideas; you are likely to hear problems that you didn’t notice in just scanning your draft. Help listeners understand your ideas by making sure that subjects and verbs are clear and by avoiding unnecessarily complex sentences.

How long does it take to read a double spaced paper?

A general rule of thumb is that one double-spaced page takes 2-2.5 minutes to read out loud. Thus an 8-10 page, double-spaced paper is often a good fit for a 15-20 minute presentation. Adhere to the time limit. Make sure that your written paper conforms to the presentation constraints.

What Is a Conference Paper?

A conference paper is a written document that outlines your oral presentation at a conference. These papers cover the details of the presentations for attendees to review in situations when the attendee was not able to hear the oral presentation.

How to organize a conference paper?

The organization of your conference paper should flow in a logical sequence from experimental design to conclusions. Put significant thought into fully evaluating the results and conclusions and reporting them at the conference proceedings or in a professional journal that is associated with the conference and the presentations.

Why do you submit abstracts?

Submitting an abstract also provides presenters with a way to review the abstracts of all the papers in the section your paper is assigned. This lets them address questions of how you performed your work and of which of the other presenters’ methods would also work in obtaining your goal.

What is an academic conference?

Most academic conferences publish either the abstracts of the papers presented at the conference or a copy of the full papers presented. These papers can be a great way to communicate, document new ideas and introduce your academic work to a wider audience of your peers. speaker talking at conference.

Why is an abstract important in a conference paper?

In presenting your results, you will be making conclusions, and writing an abstract is perhaps the most important part of the conference paper that you prepare because it lets people know what you used to get to those conclusions. The abstract provides the organizers with a brief overview of your topic and a summary of your results.

What is an abstract in a paper?

The abstract provides the organizers with a brief overview of your topic and a summary of your results. Organizers use the abstract to categorize the paper and group it with similar topics or areas of work. An abstract offers attendees a summary of what will be presented during a specific period of time in the preliminary schedule …

What should the focus of a paper be?

The focus of your paper should be limited to the work presented during the conference. Do not include any work done since the conference, as this will blur the line between the work presented at the conference and follow-up work that continues to develop.

How many reviewers are needed for SITE?

SITE conference submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review process by a minimum of three reviewers. Reviewers are members the conference’s international Program Committee of experts in fields specifically matching the conference topics.

What is a full paper?

A Full Paper should be much more complete; you should be very exacting in your reviews of long papers. A Full Paper can represent the earlier stages of a work; you should be generous in your reviews of short papers. I’ve gotten stuck with a paper that is much too short (long).

What does AACE do when a paper is rejected?

Authors whose papers are rejected have the opportunity to submit short papers for the second call for papers.

Do case studies need references?

Major theoretical studies should have larger reference lists. Small case studies might only need references to their theoretical underpinnings and one or two related studies. Length of Paper – Conference papers have particular limits and benefits. You should consider whether the ideas are appropriate for the length.

How to recommend acceptance in a paper?

If you’re recommending acceptance, give details outlining why, and if there are any areas that could be improved. Don’t just give a short, cursory remark such as ‘great, accept’. See Improving the Manuscript

What to do if experimental design features prominently in the paper?

If experimental design features prominently in the paper, first check that the methodology is sound – if not, this is likely to be a major flaw.

Why do you need to read a second paper?

Once the paper has passed your first read and you’ve decided the article is publishable in principle, one purpose of the second, detailed read-through is to help prepare the manuscript for publication. Of course, you may still decide to reject it following a second reading.

What is the validity of questions?

The validity of questions, the use of a detailed methodology and the data analysis being done systematically (in qualitative research)

Why is it important to read the whole paper?

This is very important because you may find some really positive aspects that can be communicated to the author. This could help them with future submissions.

What is the first read through?

If you don’t, make a note now that you need to feedback on how to improve those sections. The first read-through is a skim-read. It will help you form an initial impression of the paper and get a sense of whether your eventual recommendation will be to accept or reject the paper.

How to review a manuscript?

Step by step guide to reviewing a manuscript. Step by step. guide to reviewing a manuscript. When you receive an invitation to peer review, you should be sent a copy of the paper’s abstract to help you decide whether you wish to do the review. Try to respond to invitations promptly – it will prevent delays.


Leave a Comment