How to review a paper for an academic conference

image

You must complete your reviews using the SITE Review System. At the Executive Committee meeting, the members scan the ratings and pick an appropriate cut-off value for average rating (usually between 3.5 and 4.0). Most papers above that value are accepted; most papers below that value are rejected.

“Reviewing the paper” means reading to a level that you understand what the authors did, why it’s interesting, and why it’s important. As part of your review, you should note these things. And you should accept or reject the paper based on whether you think the *contribution* is significant enough.

Full
Answer

Can I be reviewer of the conference papers that I attend?

Some of journal editors, book editors and many conference editors organize mutual review process between paper contributors. The idea of this advice is that you can be reviewer of the conference papers that you attend.

Can I send an abstract of a review paper to a conference?

Bookmark this question. Show activity on this post. I sent an abstract of a review paper for oral presentation to a conference, and it was accepted. The presentation will be about the most important developments and contributions made in the last decade on my specific area of research.

What is the difference between a review and an academic review?

A review is not a research paper Rather than a research paper on the subject of the work,an academic review is an evaluation about the work’s message, strengths, and value.

How do you write an academic review?

place the work in context (compare it to other works). Rather than a research paper on the subject of the work,an academic review is an evaluation about the work’s message, strengths, and value.

image


Can you present a paper under review at a conference?

In social sciences, it is a popular practice to present a paper that is under review in a conference. Nothing is wrong with it.


What is review process in conference publication?

Peer review is a process in which a scientific paper is evaluated by a group of experts in the same field to make sure it meets the necessary standards for acceptance and publication.


How long does it take to review a conference paper?

Doing reviews takes time. On average, an experienced reviewer spends about 2 hours reviewing a 12-page conference paper, and 4-8 hours reviewing a 15-page journal paper. If you are inexperienced, you need to schedule more time. Before accepting to do reviews, be prepared to dedicate enough time to them.


How do you evaluate the quality of a conference?

How to identify quality Academic conferencesThe Quality of papers presented in conference and reviewing process. … Good keynote speakers who speak much relevant to the conference. … Serving the purpose and objective of the conference. … Having strong Index Journals and publications.More items…•


How do I give feedback to a conference?

“Fantastic conference – thanks so much for all your thoughtful and effective organization.” “I am always impressed with the commitment and efficiency of those who plan this conference.” “I really enjoyed my time at the conference. I am looking forward to next year’s conference.”


How many reviewers are needed for a conference paper?

three reviewersSITE conference submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review process by a minimum of three reviewers. Reviewers are members the conference’s international Program Committee of experts in fields specifically matching the conference topics.


How do you write a review paper example?

Steps for Writing an Article ReviewStep 1: Write the Title.Step 2: Cite the Article.Step 3: Article Identification.Step 4: Introduction.Step 5: Summarize the Article.Step 6: Critique It.Step 7: Craft a Conclusion.


How many papers should I review?

For every paper you submit, an editor needs to get 2-3 reviewers. Therefore you should review 2-3 papers for every paper you submit to contribute your fair share. Have an annual limit. Reviews take time and you decide to do no more than X per year.


How long does a paper stay under review?

While some take a month or two, others can take up to 6 months or more. As you have correctly observed, Statistics/Mathematics journals usually take a longer time, and may at times, take even up to a year to complete. But do not get stressed.


How do you evaluate a journal conference magazine?

Evaluating Journals & ConferencesCaliber of the research published: Read over a few articles to assess the quality and rigor of the research reported.Aims & scope statement – does it adequately describe the journal’s objectives and help you determine if you should submit your work to it?More items…•


How do I apply for a conference in Canada?

A person who is coming to Canada to attend a conference needs authorization to come to Canada, such as an eTA or visitor’s visa. No work permit is required. U.S. citizens coming from the U.S. can get authorization at the border. Everyone else will need either an eTA or visitor’s visa.


How do you present a literature review in a conference?

Presenting Literature Review in the Introduction and Discussion SectionsIntroduce the topic.Establish the significance of the study.Provide an overview of the relevant literature.Establish a context for the study using the literature.Identify knowledge gaps.Illustrate how the study will advance knowledge on the topic.


Do conferences reject papers?

because in conferences they will reject the paper on many reasons irrespective of author perspections and also may be of more no. of papers or conference suitability etc….


How do I write a review for IEEE conference?

Q: How should I write my paper according to the IEEE conference proceedings format?Abstract.Title and affiliations.Introduction.Proposed method.Experimental data and results.Conclusions.Acknowledgments.References.


Are conference presentations considered peer-reviewed?

However, while abstracts submitted to conferences are reviewed by a scientific committee for suitability and interest to the audience prior to acceptance, it is important to note that they are not considered peer-reviewed as they are not subject to the same rigorous peer-review process as are journal articles.


Most recent answer

To review a paper, it is advisable to read some available reviews in open public domain. Even comments on published and unpublished papers can help to understand the review mechanism.


Popular Answers (1)

Nowadays you have number of new and not yet established publishers that invite reviewers and editors for their international peer-reviewed open access journals. I received plenty of such invitations. Honestly, I ignore them because I have a more or less fixed lists of journals that I regularly receive invitations from for paper review.


All Answers (10)

If you mean reviewing academic papers, perhaps you should start with student journals. Some directories to consider – check journal announcements if they are looking for reviewers:


Similar questions and discussions

If research is published in conference proceedings, can it still be published in journals?


What is published scholarly review?

Published scholarly reviews are helpful models for beginner review-writers. However, we remind you that you are to write your own assessment of the work, not rely on the assessment from a review you found in a journal or on a blog. As a review-writer, your objective is to:


Why do reviewers need to examine the context of a book?

A reviewer needs to examine the context of the book to arrive at a fair understanding and evaluation of its contents and importance. Context may include the scholarship to which this book responds or the author’s personal motive for writing. Or perhaps the context is simply contemporary society or today’s headlines.


What is the body of a review?

The body of the review works to support or explain your assessment; organize your key ideas or supporting arguments into paragraphs and use evidence from the book, article, or film to demonstrate how the work is (or is not) effective, compelling, provocative, novel, or informative. As with all scholarly writing, …


How does a double entry notebook work?

In its simplest form, the double-entry notebook separates a page into two columns. In one column, you make observations about the work. In the other, you note your responses to the work. This notetaking method has two advantages. It forces you to make both sorts of notes — notes about the work and notes about your reaction to the work — and it helps you to distinguish between the two.


How to write a reverse outline?

A reverse outline helps a reader analyze the content and argument of a work of non-fiction. Read each section of a text carefully and write down two things: 1) the main point or idea, and 2) its function in the text. In other words, write down what each section says and what it does.


What is a review in critical reading?

A review is organized around an assessment of the work or a focused message about its value to the field. Revisit your notes and consider your responses to your questions from critical reading to develop a clear statement that evaluates the work and provides an explanation for that evaluation.


What is the objective of a review writer?

As a review-writer, your objective is to: understand a work on its own terms (analyze it) bring your own knowledge to bear on a work (respond to it) critique the work while considering validity, truth, and slant (evaluate it) place the work in context (compare it to other works).


Why are conference papers special?

Knowing your audience is critical for any writing assignment, but conference papers are special because you will be physically interacting with them. Take a look at our handout on audience.


Why do we need a conference paper?

Conference papers can be an effective way to try out new ideas, introduce your work to colleagues, and hone your research questions. Presenting at a conference is a great opportunity for gaining valuable feedback from a community of scholars and for increasing your professional stature in your field. A conference paper is often both …


How to structure a presentation?

How will you structure your presentation? This is an important question, because your presentation format will shape your written document. Some possibilities for your session include: 1 A visual presentation, including software such as PowerPoint or Prezi 2 A paper that you read aloud 3 A roundtable discussion


What is roundtable discussion?

A roundtable discussion. Presentations can be a combination of these styles. For example, you might read a paper aloud while displaying images. Following your paper, you might participate in an informal conversation with your fellow presenters. You will also need to know how long your paper should be.


How long does it take to read a double spaced paper?

A general rule of thumb is that one double-spaced page takes 2-2.5 minutes to read out loud. Thus an 8-10 page, double-spaced paper is often a good fit for a 15-20 minute presentation. Adhere to the time limit. Make sure that your written paper conforms to the presentation constraints.


How to start a research discussion?

You can begin by connecting your research to the audience’s concerns, then share a few examples/case studies from your research, and then, in conclusion, broaden the discussion back out to general issues in the field. Don’t overwhelm or confuse your audience. You should limit the information that you present.


What is the written text of a conference paper?

The written text is only one aspect of the overall conference paper. The other is your presentation. This means that your audience will evaluate both your work and you! So remember to convey the appropriate level of professionalism.

image


What Is A Review?


Common Problems with Academic Reviews


Getting Started: Approaches to Reading and Notetaking

  • Pre-Reading
    Pre-reading helps a reader to see a book as a whole. Often, the acknowledgments, preface, and table of contents of a book offer insights about the book’s purpose and direction. Take time before you begin chapter one to read the introduction and conclusion, examine chapter titles, an…
  • Reverse outline
    A reverse outline helps a reader analyze the content and argument of a work of non-fiction. Read each section of a text carefully and write down two things: 1) the main point or idea, and 2) its function in the text. In other words, write down what each section says and what it does. This wil…

See more on trentu.ca


Understand and Analyze The Work

  • It is extremely important to work toward seeing a clear and accurate picture of a work. One approach is to try to suspend your judgment for a while, focusing instead on describing or outlining a text. A student once described this as listening to the author’s voice rather than to their own. Ask questions to support your understanding of the work.

See more on trentu.ca


Organizing and Writing The Review

  • A review is organized around an assessment of the work or a focused message about its value to the field. Revisit your notes and consider your responses to your questions from critical reading to develop a clear statement that evaluates the work and provides an explanation for that evaluation. For example: X is an important work because it provides…

See more on trentu.ca

Leave a Comment