How to review paper for economics conference


You must complete your reviews using the SITE Review System. At the Executive Committee meeting, the members scan the ratings and pick an appropriate cut-off value for average rating (usually between 3.5 and 4.0). Most papers above that value are accepted; most papers below that value are rejected.


How do you review a paper during the paper review process?

During the paper review process, review the paper using the following guidelines: The primary aspect for accepting/rejecting a paper is its contribution: We consider a paper of sufficient conference quality if it presents a strong, tangible contribution to a specific aspect of the authors’ research.

Can I be reviewer of the conference papers that I attend?

Some of journal editors, book editors and many conference editors organize mutual review process between paper contributors. The idea of this advice is that you can be reviewer of the conference papers that you attend.

Can I send an abstract of a review paper to a conference?

Bookmark this question. Show activity on this post. I sent an abstract of a review paper for oral presentation to a conference, and it was accepted. The presentation will be about the most important developments and contributions made in the last decade on my specific area of research.

What makes a paper sufficient for a conference?

The primary aspect for accepting/rejecting a paper is its contribution: We consider a paper of sufficient conference quality if it presents a strong, tangible contribution to a specific aspect of the authors’ research.


What is an economic review?

A quarterly research publication with articles on macroeconomics and monetary policy, regional and international economics, and banking and financial markets.

What is the most cited paper in economics?

Contexts in source publication The most cited paper of all time in business & economics is the classical paper by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky published in Econometrica that gave Kahneman the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2002. …

What are the big 5 economics journals?

A single publication in one of the big five—The American Economic Review, Econometrica, the Journal of Political Economy, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, and the Review of Economic Studies—is sometimes the difference between getting tenure and restarting a career elsewhere.

How do you cite the American Economic Review?

For citations in the text, use author last name(s) only, followed by year of publication in parentheses. When listing a string of references within the text, arrange first in chronological order, then alphabetically within years. If there are four or more authors, refer to the first author, followed by et al.

How do I increase my citations?

To boost your citation count to maximize impact, consider these 10 simple techniques:Cite your past work when it is relevant to a new manuscript. … Carefully choose your keywords. … Use your keywords and phrases in your title and repeatedly in your abstract. … Use a consistent form of your name on all of your papers.More items…

Who has the most Google Scholar citations?

Highly Cited Researchers (h>100) according to their Google Scholar Citations public profilesRANKNAMECITATIONS1Ronald C Kessler4663082JoAnn E Manson3836803Robert Langer3599534Graham Colditz34961792 more rows

What is a good impact factor in Economics?

The Impact Factor and Ranking of the Journal of Socio-EconomicsTitleH index2-Year Impact FactorEconomic Journal802.12International Economic Review491.82European Economic Review681.81Cambridge Journal of Economics371.7860 more rows

Is Econometrics a good journal?

The overall rank of Journal of Econometrics is 462. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 3.523. SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals.

What are top field journals Economics?

Traditionally the top five journals in economics are: the American Economic Review, Econometrica, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, the Journal of Political Economy, and the Review of Economic Studies.

How do you cite a source in an economics paper?

Most citations in economics do not require a footnote; it is usually sufficient to use the author’s(s’) last name(s) and the year of publication in or after a sentence in the text and avoid the disruption of a footnote reference.

How do I cite in APA format?

When using APA format, follow the author-date method of in-text citation. This means that the author’s last name and the year of publication for the source should appear in the text, like, for example, (Jones, 1998). One complete reference for each source should appear in the reference list at the end of the paper.

Is the American Economic Review peer reviewed?

The American Economic Review is a monthly peer-reviewed academic journal published by the American Economic Association.

Who is the most cited economist?

Andrei ShleiferThe rankingsRankAuthorScore1Andrei Shleifer Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA) National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA)663312James J. Heckman Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (USA)5060096 more rows

Where can I read economics research papers?

Economics Research This is a fantastic resource to locate leading economics research. … REsearch Papers in EConomics. … … … … … … items…

What are the issues covered in the article “The Impact of Government Policies”?

The articles cover various issues ranging from the impacts of government policies such as health care policies, security policies, fiscal policies and employment policies on the national economy to the impact of geopolitical events on the global economy.

What is the effect of multiplication of gains in an economy?

When demand and consumer consumption increases, businesses make more investments and expand in anticipation of higher demand. As a result, they take in more workers while improving employment rates.

What happens to the GDP when the government spends less?

Government expenditure is one of the major components of GDP thus when the government spends less, GDP drops. High national debt also means that the government will have less funds to finance national programs such as medical care and social security. Other critical services such a defense will also suffer.

Is the global economy still feeling the effects of the last global recession?

The global economy is still feeling the impacts of the last global recession thus minimal growth this expected. IMF projects that 2014 and 2015 growth will slightly surpass 3% recorded last year. However, economic growth is likely to be hampered by three major obstacles.

What do you consider when deciding whether to accept an invitation to review a paper?

I consider four factors: whether I’m sufficiently knowledgeable about the topic to offer an intelligent assessment, how interesting I find the research topic, whether I’m free of any conflict of interest, and whether I have the time.

Once you’ve agreed to complete a review, how do you approach the paper?

Unless it’s for a journal I know well, the first thing I do is check what format the journal prefers the review to be in. Some journals have structured review criteria; others just ask for general and specific comments. Knowing this in advance helps save time later.

How do you go about drafting the review? Do you sign it?

Using a copy of the manuscript that I first marked up with any questions that I had, I write a brief summary of what the paper is about and what I feel about its solidity. Then I run through the specific points I raised in my summary in more detail, in the order they appeared in the paper, providing page and paragraph numbers for most.

When, and how, do you decide on your recommendation?

I make a decision after drafting my review. I usually sit on the review for a day and then reread it to be sure it is balanced and fair before deciding anything.
– Boatman-Reich

How long does it take you to review a paper?

This varies widely, from a few minutes if there is clearly a major problem with the paper to half a day if the paper is really interesting but there are aspects that I don’t understand.

What further advice do you have for researchers who are new to the peer-review process?

Many reviewers are not polite enough. It’s OK for a paper to say something that you don’t agree with.

Most recent answer

To review a paper, it is advisable to read some available reviews in open public domain. Even comments on published and unpublished papers can help to understand the review mechanism.

Popular Answers (1)

Nowadays you have number of new and not yet established publishers that invite reviewers and editors for their international peer-reviewed open access journals. I received plenty of such invitations. Honestly, I ignore them because I have a more or less fixed lists of journals that I regularly receive invitations from for paper review.

All Answers (10)

If you mean reviewing academic papers, perhaps you should start with student journals. Some directories to consider – check journal announcements if they are looking for reviewers:

Similar questions and discussions

If research is published in conference proceedings, can it still be published in journals?

Conference Papers – Reviewing Guidelines

This document guides those who participate in the ISMAR 2021 reviewing process and is directed towards those who perform full reviews of conference papers (i.e., secondary coordinator 2AC, committee members, and reviewers) and meta-reviews (primary coordinator 1AC).

A. Reviewing a Conference Paper for ISMAR 2021

The primary aspect for accepting/rejecting a paper is its contribution: We consider a paper of sufficient conference quality if it presents a strong, tangible contribution to a specific aspect of the authors’ research.

B. Write a Review

The following guidelines outline the content and key points of a high-quality review for ISMAR 2021. Please adhere to the guidelines and contact the conference program chairs or review coordinators for any questions.

C. Write a Meta-Review

The following guidelines outline the content of a good meta-review. The section is for review coordinators (1AC) and explains the content the chairs believe supports a decision best.

D. Review Resubmitted Journal Papers

This section describes the review process for journal papers, resubmitted to the conference paper track, in case authors asked for review continuity. This section is directed to the primary and secondary coordinators only.

E. COVID-19 Situation

We are aware that a lot of researchers are currently facing major challenges due to COVID-19 with regard to conducting research. In particular, in-person user evaluation is currently, for most researchers, impossible. However, it is important to highlight that ISMAR is not lowering the publication standard.

F. ISMAR 6-Point Ranking

The section explains the ISMAR 6-point ranking and explains when we think one should select a particular score. We are aware that the decision can be subjective in many cases and that selecting between two is often a judgment call. We hope that this explanation removes some fuzziness.

How many reviewers are needed for SITE?

SITE conference submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review process by a minimum of three reviewers. Reviewers are members the conference’s international Program Committee of experts in fields specifically matching the conference topics.

What is a full paper?

A Full Paper should be much more complete; you should be very exacting in your reviews of long papers. A Full Paper can represent the earlier stages of a work; you should be generous in your reviews of short papers. I’ve gotten stuck with a paper that is much too short (long).

What does AACE do when a paper is rejected?

Authors whose papers are rejected have the opportunity to submit short papers for the second call for papers.


Leave a Comment